Cedar Centre For Legal Studies
26 June 2025
On the occasion of 26 June, the International Day in Support of Victims of Torture- which symbolizes the global commitment to ending the practice of torture and other ill-treatment- we, the undersigned organizations, express our deep concern over the ongoing impunity for the crime of torture in Lebanon and the lack of effective implementation of the Anti-Torture Law enacted in 2017.
Despite Lebanon’s accession to the United Nations Convention against Torture (CAT) in 2000, along with its Optional Protocol in 2008, and its enactment of Law No. 65/2017, practical steps to ensure the prevention of torture and other ill-treatment and hold perpetrators accountable remain very limited. Furthermore, the Istanbul Protocol has not yet been adopted as a national reference for documenting and investigating cases of torture and other ill-treatment.
On 19 September 2017, the Lebanese Parliament passed Law No. 65/2017, which criminalizes torture, but requires significant amendments to comply with Lebanon’s international obligations under the CAT. Specifically, the Committee Against Torture has called on Lebanon to amend the anti-torture law to remove the statute of limitations, ensure the penalties reflect the grave nature of the crime, and include a complete definition of torture that comply with the CAT . The Committee also noted high levels of impunity around the crime of torture.
More than seven years after passing the anti-torture law, no serious prosecutions of alleged perpetrators have been recorded, and most of the complaints citing the anti-torture law have not been investigated. Victims’ complaints are often ignored or referred to the military judiciary, in violation of the principle of an independent and impartial judiciary.
In July 2019, the government appointed members of the National Human Rights Commission, including the National Preventive Mechanism against Torture established under the Optional Protocol. However, the Commission remains unable to perform its duties due to the failure to issue the necessary implementing decrees and the lack of funding and administrative facilities.
The Case of Bashar Abed Al-Saud
On 31 August 2022, Bashar Abed Al-Saud, a Syrian refugee, died just one day after his arrest by the State Security Directorate. Reports indicated that he was tortured by an officer and four low rank officers at the General Directorate of State Security in Tebnine. Despite the arrest of the five officers, the case was referred to the military court, in violation of Lebanon’s domestic and international obligations.
On 01 November 2024, nearly two years after his death, the Beirut military court issued its verdict in the case: all defendants were sentenced to time served after the court reduced the nature of their crime from felony to misdemeanour, dropped the felony charges under the anti-torture law and replaced them with the Article 166 of the Code of Military Justice that prohibits violating regulations, orders and general instructions.
This verdict was issued without sufficient justification, despite the presence of substantial evidence proving that the torture Al-Saud endured during his detention was the direct cause of his death. This ruling contradicted the findings of two forensic doctors appointed by the judicial authorities, who concluded that his death resulted from the severe beatings inflicted on him while in custody.
The Case of Abdulrahman Al-Qaradawi
On 28 December 2024, poet and political dissident Abdulrahman Youssef Al-Qaradawi was arrested in Lebanon upon returning from Syria based on an Arab Interior Ministers Council warrant triggered by politically motivated charges from Egypt and the UAE. Al-Qaradawi, known for his critical stance toward both regimes and his vocal defense of democratic freedoms, was accused of inciting unrest and spreading false information. Lebanese authorities interrogated him and reviewed extradition requests from both Egypt and the UAE.
Despite legal appeals and urgent interventions by human rights organisations and the UN Special Rapporteurs—Lebanon deported Al-Qaradawi to the UAE on 8 January 2025. He has been held incommunicado ever since, prohibited from contacting his family except for one time when he was allowed to place a one-minute call to his family. He also remains denied legal counsel of his choice.
In deporting Al-Qaradawi, Lebanon violated its obligations under the Convention against Torture and the customary international legal principle of non-refoulement, which prohibits the deportation of any person to a country where they face the real risk of torture or other serious human rights violations. The deportation, despite a pending appeal and substantial evidence of potential torture or other ill-treatment, underscores growing concerns about the misuse of judicial cooperation mechanisms in the region to suppress dissent.
In light of his ongoing enforced disappearance since January 2025 and Lebanon’s obligations under the principle of non-refoulement and the Convention against Torture, authorities must conduct a transparent review of the deportation of Abdulrahman Al-Qaradawi and formally engage with the Emirati authorities to ensure his safety, disclose his fate and whereabouts, and guarantee his access to legal counsel and family contact.
Recommendations
We, the undersigned, urge the Lebanese authorities to take the following immediate actions:
Signatories: